Case mix, outcome and activity for obstetric admissions to adult, general critical care units: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction Risk prediction scores usually overestimate mortality in obstetric populations because mortality rates in this group are considerably lower than in others. Studies examining this effect were generally small and did not distinguish between obstetric and nonobstetric pathologies. We evaluated the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II model in obstetric admissions to critical care units contributing to the ICNARC Case Mix Programme. Methods All obstetric admissions were extracted from the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database of 219,468 admissions to UK critical care units from 1995 to 2003 inclusive. Cases were divided into direct obstetric pathologies and indirect or coincidental pathologies, and compared with a control cohort of all women aged 16–50 years not included in the obstetric categories. The predictive ability of APACHE II was evaluated in the three groups. A prognostic model was developed for direct obstetric admissions to predict the risk for hospital mortality. A log-linear model was developed to predict the length of stay in the critical care unit. Results A total of 1452 direct obstetric admissions were identified, the most common pathologies being haemorrhage and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. There were 278 admissions identified as indirect or coincidental and 22,938 in the nonpregnant control cohort. Hospital mortality rates were 2.2%, 6.0% and 19.6% for the direct obstetric group, the indirect or coincidental group, and the control cohort, respectively. Cox regression calibration analysis showed a reasonable fit of the APACHE II model for the nonpregnant control cohort (slope = 1.1, intercept = -0.1). However, the APACHE II model vastly overestimated mortality for obstetric admissions (mortality ratio = 0.25). Risk prediction modelling demonstrated that the Glasgow Coma Scale score was the best discriminator between survival and death in obstetric admissions. Conclusion This study confirms that APACHE II overestimates mortality in obstetric admissions to critical care units. This may be because of the physiological changes in pregnancy or the unique scoring profile of obstetric pathologies such as HELLP syndrome. It may be possible to recalibrate the APACHE II score for obstetric admissions or to devise an alternative score specifically for obstetric admissions. Introduction Risk prediction scores, such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and III, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, are used to stratify the risk for death for S25 APACHE = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; APS = Acute Physiology Score; AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval; CMP = Case Mix Programme; CMPD = Case Mix Programme Database; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; HELLP = haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets; ICNARC = Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre; ICU = intensive care unit; PaO2 = arterial oxygen tension; ROC = receiver operating characteristic. Critical Care Vol 9 No Suppl 3 Harrison et al. S26 each admission to a critical care unit in order to standardize data for the purposes of audit and research. They have also been modified for clinical use as early warning scores in general wards to help junior medical and nursing staff to identify those patients who are at risk for requiring medical attention or admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Several scores have been evaluated in obstetric patients in general ICUs and found to overestimate [1-4], underestimate [5] and accurately predict [6,7] mortality. These surveys were relatively small and retrospective and therefore may not have identified all suitable cases. In particular, not all distinguished between obstetric and nonobstetric pathologies. It is known that mortality rates for obstetric admissions to ICUs are lower than those for the population background, particularly in women with obstetric pathologies such as severe preeclampsia and massive haemorrhage. Because the rate of obstetric admission to ICU is low, there is little opportunity for any individual to gain extensive clinical experience. Evaluating the APACHE II score in obstetric patients would facilitate the development of clinical care pathways, allow appropriate risk stratification and promote the development of a specific obstetric severity of illness score. We evaluated the performance of the APACHE II score for the prediction of mortality in women with primary obstetric pathologies and those with coincidental pathologies while pregnant, using a high-quality clinical database of admissions to general critical care units. Secondary analysis was performed to develop a revised model for the prediction of mortality and length of stay. Materials and methods Case Mix Programme Database The Case Mix Programme (CMP) is a national comparative audit of adult, general critical care units (including ICUs and combined intensive care and high dependency units) in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, co-ordinated by the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC). Data were extracted for 219,468 admissions from 159 critical care units from the CMP Database (CMPD), covering the period from December 1995 to June 2003 inclusive. Details regarding data collection and validation were reported previously [8]. Selection of cases Details regarding admissions of females aged 16–50 years inclusive were selected from the CMPD. Obstetric admissions were identified from the 'Primary reason for admission' and 'Secondary reason for admission' fields, and from either of two, optionally recorded 'Other condition relevant to the admission' fields. These four fields are all coded using the ICNARC Coding Method [9] – a hierarchical method specifically designed for coding reasons for admission to ICU. Additional cases were identified by searching the free text field of the database. All admissions identified from the text field search and not from other fields were checked by one author for appropriateness. When there was uncertainty regarding whether such a case should be included, a consensus was arrived at among all authors. Two groups of obstetric admissions were identified, namely direct obstetric admissions and indirect or coincidental obstetric admissions. Direct obstetric admissions included all women for whom the 'Primary reason for admission' or 'Secondary reason for admission' field contained any condition from Table 1. Indirect or coincidental obstetric admissions included all women who did not fall into the direct obstetric admission category and met any of the following criteria: the 'Other condition relevant to the admission' fields contained any condition from Table 1; the entry in the 'Primary reason for admission', 'Secondary reason for admission', or 'Other condition relevant to the admission' fields was any partially completed code with the site tier recorded as 'Ovary, fallopian tubes, uterus or genitalia (obstetric)'; or the patient was identified as being pregnant or having recently been pregnant by searching the text field for a predefined list of pregnancyrelated search terms.
منابع مشابه
Case mix, outcome, and activity for admissions to UK critical care units with severe acute pancreatitis: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database
INTRODUCTION Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) requiring admission to a critical care unit is associated with high mortality and long lengths of stay. We describe the case mix, outcome, and activity of admissions with SAP who were identified from a high-quality clinical database. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of the ICNARC (Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre) Case Mix P...
متن کاملCharacteristics and outcome for admissions to adult, general critical care units with acute severe asthma: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database
INTRODUCTION This report describes the case mix, outcome and activity (duration of intensive care unit [ICU] and hospital stay, inter-hospital transfer, and readmissions to the ICU) for admissions to ICUs for acute severe asthma, and investigates the effect of case mix factors on outcome. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a high-quality clinical database (the Intensive Ca...
متن کاملThe epidemiology of severe sepsis in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 1996 to 2004: secondary analysis of a high quality clinical database, the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database
INTRODUCTION To evaluate the impact of recent evidence-based treatments for severe sepsis in routine clinical care requires an understanding of the underlying epidemiology, particularly with regard to trends over time. We interrogated a high quality clinical database to examine trends in the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis over a nine-year period. METHODS Admissions with severe sepsi...
متن کاملBurden of septic shock in the uk
Methods We analyzed length of stay, survival and organ support of adult septic shock patient admitted to general critical care units. Septic shock was defined as severe sepsis including the presence of cardiovascular organ dysfunction (from cardiovascular SOFA Score of 2, 3 or 4). Physiological definitions were matched as closely as possible to those used in the PROWESS trial [2]. These data de...
متن کاملCase mix, outcome and length of stay for admissions to adult, general critical care units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database
INTRODUCTION The present paper describes the methods of data collection and validation employed in the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme (CMP), a national comparative audit of outcome for adult, critical care admissions. The paper also describes the case mix, outcome and activity of the admissions in the Case Mix Programme Database (CMPD). METHODS The CMP coll...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005